![copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013 copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013](https://i0.wp.com/img.creativemark.co.uk/uploads/images/288/15288/img3File.png)
I'm an application repackager and I had the very same problem when trying to distribute a repackaged version of the Design Review and the TrueView applications and a I'm guessing quite a few others do to. (Snarky closing epithet pre-deleted to help ease moderator workload) So, before you further engage in attacking users who pay thousands and tens of thousands of dollars for products whose quality control and product support, while by no means infernal, could use improvement and MORE PAID STAFF, how about measuring up to your professed status by spending a bit less time increasing your post count and a bit more time trying to answer users' questions? And yes, this sometimes means spelling out things that were missed in the product documentation process - if your agenda here is to provide support.
![copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013 copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013](https://images.sftcdn.net/images/t_app-cover-l,f_auto/p/4759bb08-96d1-11e6-84d3-00163ec9f5fa/1563952616/autodesk-dwg-trueview-screenshot.png)
![copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013 copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IhavEUO1ptA/maxresdefault.jpg)
Understanding that choosing to field questions that range from delightfully challenging to dreadfully dull can take its toll on one's fortitude and sense of service, neither excuse nor right exists to impute hidden motives to community members who visit here because stuff isn't working. Indeed, your recent posts evidence an elitist and, frankly, negative approach to addressing users who ask for help. Your surprise message appears to show a personal agenda more intent on belittling forum members than on solving problems. The failure isolated in this thread may, in fact, have a very simple solution (After all, most of these things have simple solutions) - but the vendor should be taking the time to pursue it. With hidden agendas in mind, can you please clarify your agenda for abandoning this thread three months ago instead of responding to the query made by a very active forum member with a very relevant question? Hidden agenda? Why does that come to your mind - unless perhaps you have a hidden (or, judging by your signature links, commercial) agenda for making ad hominem attacks on forum members who are willing to testify about issues that need holistic attention?
![copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013 copy dwf to dwg with autocad design review 2013](https://windows-cdn.softpedia.com/screenshots/Autodesk-DWF-Viewer_28.png)
COPY DWF TO DWG WITH AUTOCAD DESIGN REVIEW 2013 SOFTWARE
"Expert Elite?" How does a recognized expert NOT see that the issue in this thread is an honest call, and that the prompt seen by many (only a small percentage of whom take the time to register and post here) is spurious and related to a software and/or instruction problem, and not to user error or inexperience? Perhaps one might review more than a single "other post" by any one of the scads (or perhaps "plethora" - google it) of Autocad users whose questions remain unanswered, and whose software failure issues remain unresolved. Perhaps one might consider investing hours of non-billable time troubleshooting one's way through all possibilities when realities fail to match reason and technically relevant expectations. Perhaps one might try reviewing this thread's opening post, which defines the public - and universal - agenda of getting the software to work as expected for users who simply want to get their work done on time and, with luck and not overwhelming personal sacrifice, on budget. Thanks for your reply, but, excuse me?!? How anyone might infer a "hidden agenda" in any of these posts is a feat of master intelligence far beyond my humble ken.